× If you have problems during the execution of MRCC, please attach the output with an adequate description of your case as well as the followings:
• the way mrcc was invoked
• the way build.mrcc was invoked
• the output of build.mrcc
• compiler version (for example: ifort -V, gfortran -v)
• blas/lapack versions
• as well as gcc and glibc versions

This information really helps us during troubleshooting :)

# Fail with fort.56 with symm=1

2 years 6 months ago #959 by yanmeiyu
Dear MRCC experts,

For a close shelled system it should be output singlet and triplet states, but the code give me states all with spin multiplicity being 2. I found fort.56 always reads nsing=0, ntrip=0 although I have defined symm=1 with nsing and ntrip of some nonzero values. I am using MRCC2015, since I still have some trouble with MRCC2019. Could you help me have a check, thank you very much!

[ymyu@admin1 Be]$less MINP iface=dirac calc=CCSD mem=7500MB symm=1 nsing=2 ntrip=9 refdet=vector 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 and [ymyu@admin1 Be]$ less fort.56
2 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 11 0 0 6 0 0 0.00000 0 7500 0 0.000E+00
ex.lev,nsing,ntrip, rest,CC/CI,dens,conver,symm, diag, CS ,spatial, HF ,ndoub,nacto,nactv, tol ,maxex, sacc, freq, dboc, mem, locno, eps
1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

I attached one test output, thank you very much for your help!

Best regards,
Yanmei

#### File Attachment:

File Name: Be_Be.txt
File Size:65 KB

#### File Attachment:

File Name: Be.txt
File Size:85 KB
##### Attachments:

2 years 6 months ago #960 by kallay
Dear Yanmei,
The file fort.56 is correct. For relativistic calculations ndoub equals the total number of states, and nsing and ntrip should be zero.

Best regards,
Mihaly Kallay

2 years 6 months ago #961 by yanmeiyu
Dear Prof. Kallay,

The output giving Spin multiplicity=2 is correct or not? For singlet and triplet state, S equals to 0 and 1, so the spin multiplicity should be 1 and 3? Thank you very much!

Best regards,

Yanmei

2 years 6 months ago #962 by kallay
That is correct. In the relativistic case, these should be ignored.

Best regards,
Mihaly Kallay