- Posts: 14
- Thank you received: 0
Feature request: analytic CCSD(T) gradients/hessians
- mhvg1994
- Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
-
Less
More
4 days 9 hours ago #1613
by mhvg1994
Feature request: analytic CCSD(T) gradients/hessians was created by mhvg1994
I was wondering whether you were planning on ever adding the analytic gradients and/or hessians for CCSD(T) in MRCC natively? I am aware that MRCC can interface with CFOUR to use their gradients, but, based on my experience with CFOUR, MRCC is far quicker, parallelises more efficiently and is easier to obtain.
I know it's unlikely to happen but, based on the speed of your CCSDT calculations (which absolutely amazed me!) I thought I would ask.
I know it's unlikely to happen but, based on the speed of your CCSDT calculations (which absolutely amazed me!) I thought I would ask.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- nagypeter
- Offline
- Premium Member
-
- MRCC developer
4 days 3 hours ago #1614
by nagypeter
Replied by nagypeter on topic Feature request: analytic CCSD(T) gradients/hessians
Thank you for the appreciation and interest.
The development of an efficient CCSD(T) analytic gradient code is at an advanced stage, it will happen. Analytic Hessian is not in the short term plans, seminumerical should be fine for most purposes.
Best regards,
Peter
The development of an efficient CCSD(T) analytic gradient code is at an advanced stage, it will happen. Analytic Hessian is not in the short term plans, seminumerical should be fine for most purposes.
Best regards,
Peter
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- mhvg1994
- Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 14
- Thank you received: 0
1 day 13 hours ago - 1 day 13 hours ago #1615
by mhvg1994
Replied by mhvg1994 on topic Feature request: analytic CCSD(T) gradients/hessians
That's amazing, I assumed there were no plans to do it at all! Looking forward to it!!! 😃
The main reason for the analytic hessians would be for (G)VPT2 and other fun things, but I understand that can be very niche, considering it's generally so expensive. But, if your code is as fast as I think it is, CCSD(T) anharmonic frequencies could be far more practical than they are now... (CFOUR is far too slow for it to be worth the effort, usually.)
The main reason for the analytic hessians would be for (G)VPT2 and other fun things, but I understand that can be very niche, considering it's generally so expensive. But, if your code is as fast as I think it is, CCSD(T) anharmonic frequencies could be far more practical than they are now... (CFOUR is far too slow for it to be worth the effort, usually.)
Last edit: 1 day 13 hours ago by mhvg1994. Reason: Adding comment about analytic hessians
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.039 seconds